Drawing for HEALTHAHEAD

USPTO serial 77824040

HEALTHAHEAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHAHEAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean Merrill

SEAN MERRILL GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY3135 EASTON TURNPIKECORPORATE TRADEMARK OPERATIONFAIRFIELD, CT 06828-0001

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Education services, namely, providing training in the form of workshops, conferences and seminars on programs in the field of physical health and wellness for employeesACTIVE—
042Conducting worksite surveys to determine if worksites meet employee health condition requirements and standardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 22, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 28, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 22, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 15, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 29, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 9, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 24, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 24, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 6, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 3, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 20, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 14, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance