USPTO serial 77825945
TRI-TANIUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRI-TANIUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey D. Peterson
JEFFREY D. PETERSON MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICHPO BOX 1806MADISON, WI 53701-1806UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Coasters not of paper and not being table linen; cooking utensils with plastic handles, namely, forks, ladles, skimmers, solid turners, solid spoons, slotted spoons and solid mashers; bake ware; stainless steel serving utensils, namely, cake servers, cold meat forks, butter knives, sugar spoons, salad serving spoons, salad serving forks, solid serving spoons, slotted serving spoons, ladles, serving forks, pasta servers and serving spatulas; cookware namely, sauce pans, skillets, Dutch ovens, steamer/colanders, flat and dome covers for pots and pans; kitchenware namely, cookie sheets, cake pans, pizza pans, omelet pans, salad spinners, mixing bowls, non-electric griddles; china namely, dinner plates, lunch plates, cups, saucers, serving bowls, gravy boats and platters; glass dinnerware namely, glass dishes, dinner plates, lunch plates, cups, saucers, serving bowls, gravy boats and platters; china and porcelain dinnerware and glass beverage ware; cookware lids having a whistle which sounds when the cookware reaches the proper temperature; stainless steel cookware, namely, pots and pans | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |