Drawing for INTERNET REMARKETING CENTER

USPTO serial 77827784

INTERNET REMARKETING CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERNET REMARKETING CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John S. Artz

JOHN S ARTZ DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC38525 WOODWARD AVENUESUITE 2000BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5092

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042ONLINE PRODUCT RESEARCH ASSOCIATED WITH PROCESSING OF VEHICLES IN THE WHOLESALE MARKET AS RELATED TO PROVIDING INFORMATION ABOUT THE CONDITION OF OFF-LEASE VEHICLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 10, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 10, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 26, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 10, 2012RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 10, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 14, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 14, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 19, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 3, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 3, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 6, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance