USPTO serial 77828659
FLEXIGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLEXIGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robin A. Sannes
ROBIN A. SANNES IPLM GROUP, P.A.PO BOX 18455MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55418-0455UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | fall protection and safety equipment, namely, metal guardrail systems comprising horizontal railings and vertical posts; metal fixed and portable ladder systems comprising access ladders, work platforms, cages, wheels, hand rails, and guardrails; metal fixed and portable work platform systems comprising access ladders, work platforms, and guardrails; metal conveyor crossover systems comprising access ladders, bridges, and guardrails; metal frame systems for mounting fall protection equipment in an overhead configuration comprising A-frames, quad-legged frames, and cantilevered frames; metal docking systems comprising access ladders, multiple work platforms, and guardrails; and metal custom access systems comprising access ladders, work platforms, and railings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 4, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |