USPTO serial 77829314
OPTISOURCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPTISOURCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele P. Schwartz
MICHELE P SCHWARTZ ANDREWS KURTH LLP1717 MAIN STSTE 3700DALLAS, TX 75201 7301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Freight logistics management and transportation management services, namely, arranging the transportation of goods for others; providing electronic tracking of freight information to others; computerized tracking and tracing of packages in transit | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for tracking packages over computer networks, intranets and the internet | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |