Drawing for ENUMAY.COM

USPTO serial 77829480

ENUMAY.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENUMAY.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay Hollander

JAY HOLLANDER HOLLANDER AND COMPANY LLC11 PENN PLZ FL 5NEW YORK, NY 10001-2003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing information about and promoting the sale of the goods and services of others in various languages via a global computer network; providing online and fax ordering services for delivery and pick up of prepared, made to order and packaged food and drink directly from third party subscribing advertiser restaurantsACTIVE—
038providing access to user searchable online restaurant menus of third party subscribing advertiser restaurants featuring available prepared , made to order and packaged food and drink, including descriptions, prices, and retailer contact information and locations of sameACTIVE—
042providing the capability via a global computer network for web site visitors to place orders online and via fax for delivery and pick up of prepared, made to order and packaged food and drink directly from third party subscribing advertiser restaurantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 22, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 6, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 15, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 4, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 25, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 11, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 11, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 22, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance