CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LA PETITE MAISON

USPTO serial 77829817

LA PETITE MAISON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LA PETITE MAISON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith Sklar

KEITH SKLAR MCCUE, SUSSMANE & ZAPFEL, P.C.521 FIFTH AVENUE, 28TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10175UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Men's, women's, and children's clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, button-down shirts, blouses, polo shirts, pants, jeans, jumpsuits, vests, coats, jackets, overalls, shorts, skirts, dresses, loungewear, pajamas, sleepwear, underwear, swimsuits, belts, socks, hats, scarves, gloves and footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 1, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 25, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 23, 2010DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2010ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 22, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 22, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 6, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 2, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 2, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 17, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 20, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2009TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Dec 8, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance