Drawing for YUMI UTTAM

USPTO serial 77830104

YUMI UTTAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4132259Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 24, 2012
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YUMI UTTAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Greger

2318 MILL ROADSUITE 1400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Handbags, sport bags, tote bags, luggage and traveling bags, holdalls, shoulder bags, attaché cases, briefcases, purses, unfitted vanity cases, wallets, school bags, duffel bags, backpacks and knapsacksSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJul 1, 2009
025Men's, women's and children's wearing apparel, namely, dresses, slacks, jeans, overalls, jumpers, shirts, blouses, knit tops, namely, cardigans, T-shirts, tank tops, sweatshirts, sweatpants, sweat-suits, sweaters, vests, shorts, skirts, culottes, jumpsuits, jackets, blazers, coats, pants, bathing suits, coverups, scarves, belts, hats, caps and toquesSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJul 1, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2015C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Mar 11, 2015C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Mar 11, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 11, 2015ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 17, 2012SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED—
Mar 16, 2012REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 9, 2012CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 7, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 7, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 9, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 9, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 9, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 6, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 4, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2011CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 19, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2010CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 13, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 6, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 6, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 5, 2010CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 2, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 2, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 9, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 14, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 14, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 18, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 22, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance