Drawing for UBICOM64

USPTO serial 77830334

UBICOM64

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UBICOM64?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda G. Henry

LINDA G. HENRY FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041-1990UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009instruction set architecture microprocessors; computer hardware and computer peripherals; computer software for use in automatic identification and processing of media streams; computer operating software embedded in internet processors; computer software embedded in internet processors for use in implementing communications networking, for use in controlling input/output drivers, and for use in connecting electronic devices to the internet; computer software for use in implementing communications networking and internet connectivity functions; computer software for use in implementing hardware functions; Integrated circuits, microprocessors, micro controllers, circuit boards and modules for use in executing software modulesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 29, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 30, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 3, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 27, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 27, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 18, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 29, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 4, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 27, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 23, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 22, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance