USPTO serial 77831794
STG STANTIVE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP POWERFUL THINKING. TRANSFORMATIVE RESULTS.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4779379Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 28, 2015
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STG STANTIVE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP POWERFUL THINKING. TRANSFORMATIVE RESULTS.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stantive Technologies Group Inc.
Kingston, Ontario, CA
Stantive Technologies Group Inc.
Kingston, Ontario, CA
Stantive Technologies Group Inc.
Kingston, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cathryn A. Berryman
CATHRYN A BERRYMAN WINSTEAD PCPO BOX 131851DALLAS, TX 75313UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation of networking hardware and optimization of networking hardware, namely, upgrading of networking hardware | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stantive Technologies Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stantive Technologies Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stantive Technologies Group Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named STG STANTIVE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP POWERFUL THINKING. TRANSFORMATIVE RESULTS.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 12, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |