USPTO serial 77831809
POWERFUL THINKING. TRANSFORMATIVE RESULTS.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4464364Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 14, 2014
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with POWERFUL THINKING. TRANSFORMATIVE RESULTS.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stantive Technologies Group Inc.
Kingston, Ontario, CA
Stantive Technologies Group Inc.
Kingston, Ontario, CA
Stantive Technologies Group Inc.
Kingston, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cathryn A. Berryman
CATHRYN A. BERRYMAN WINSTEAD PCPO BOX 131851DALLAS, TX 75313UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation of networking hardware; optimization of networking hardware, namely, upgrading of networking hardware | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer information technology systems integration services; computer networking hardware consulting; strategic information technology consulting services; installation of networking software; optimization of networking software, namely, upgrading of networking software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stantive Technologies Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stantive Technologies Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Stantive Technologies Group Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named POWERFUL THINKING. TRANSFORMATIVE RESULTS.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 29, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 22, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 27, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2013 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |