Drawing for FULL COOKIE

USPTO serial 77832116

FULL COOKIE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FULL COOKIE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad D. Rose

BRAD D. ROSE PRYOR CASHMAN LLP7 TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036-6569UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceuticals for use in weight loss, namely, appetite suppressants; vitamins and dietary and nutritional supplements for use in weight loss; appetite suppressants; beta blockers; calcium supplements; dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement; diet capsules; diet pills; dietary and nutritional supplements; dietetic foods adapted for medical use; dietary supplemental drinks; meal replacement shakes; thyroid and para-thyroid hormone preparations; diureticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 3, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 12, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance