USPTO serial 77833381
SNACKING MADE SIMPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNACKING MADE SIMPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VANCOUVER, BC, CA
VANCOUVER, BC, CA
VANCOUVER, BC, CA
Vancouver, BC, CA
VANCOUVER, B.C., CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Cohen
Michael A. Cohen Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.1211 SW Fifth AvenueSuites 1500-2000Portland, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed nuts | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Snack foods, namely, potato-based snack foods, corn-based snack foods, wheat-based snack foods, rice-based snack-foods, barley-based snack foods; pretzels; and seasonings; non-alcoholic non-dairy beverages, namely, rice-based beverages | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBAL PRIME FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GLOBAL PRIME FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SHEARER'S FOODS CANADA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Snack Alliance, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NALLEY'S CANADA LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SNACKING MADE SIMPLE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2011 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |