Drawing for ARIES POWER & INDUSTRIAL CO.

USPTO serial 77834972

ARIES POWER & INDUSTRIAL CO.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARIES POWER & INDUSTRIAL CO.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JULIA ANNE MATHESON

JULIA ANNE MATHESON FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4432UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management; consultancy services in the field of energy and power use and conservation, energy efficiency and energy use management; conducting feasibility studies for business purposesACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, scientific research and development related to the generation, production, accumulation, conversion, transformation, transmission, conduction, supply, distribution, control, regulation, and use of electricity and renewable energy; design of energy and power systems; engineering services; consulting in the field of engineering related to the generation, production, accumulation, conversion, transformation, transmission, conduction, supply, distribution, control, regulation, and use of electricity and renewable energy; consultation services in the field of development of conventional and renewable energy resourcesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 27, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 26, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 19, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 5, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 27, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 26, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 19, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 25, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 25, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 25, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance