Drawing for MARC & SAM

USPTO serial 77835231

MARC & SAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MARC & SAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Sotis

Mary Sotis Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC488 Madison AvenueNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Ground and whole bean coffee; cocoa; herbal and non-herbal teas; coffee, tea, cocoa and espresso beverages, and beverages made with a base of coffee and/or espresso; ready-to-drink coffee beverages; flavoring syrups for beverages; baked goods, namely, muffins, scones, biscuits, cookies, pastries and breads; chocolate; confectionery, namely, cocoa-based ingredient in confectionary products, candy, frozen confections, fudge, toffee, marshmallow and marzipanACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 25, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 23, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 18, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 2, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 20, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 18, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 18, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 19, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 24, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 13, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 17, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 17, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 25, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance