CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for HOSTESS BRANDS

USPTO serial 77836628

HOSTESS BRANDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAUFMAN, LAURIE R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOSTESS BRANDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas H. Van Hoozer

THOMAS H. VAN HOOZER HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP10801 MASTIN ST STE 1000OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210-1697UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020display units for merchandising bakery productsACTIVE—
022fabric disposable sacks for holding stuffing in birds for cooking purposesACTIVE—
029potato chips; processed peanuts; whipped cream; dairy-based whipped topping; non-dairy based whipped topping; milk; cream; milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurtACTIVE—
030bakery goods; crackers; cookies; cracker and cheese combinations; cracker and peanut butter combinations; granola-based snack bars; breakfast cereals; breadsticks; bread crumbs; croutons, stuffing mixes containing bread; cornbread stuffing; salad dressing; biscuits; bread; bread rolls; buns; cakes; rice cakes; cereal-based snack food; ice-cream; frozen yogurt; pastry; sherbets; frozen custard; frozen confections; tortillas; tortilla chips; confectionery, namely, chocolates, marshmallows, pastilles and hard candies; preparations made from cereals, namely, processed cereals, cereal based energy barsACTIVE—
035retail store services featuring bakery goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 19, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 19, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 19, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 17, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 30, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 30, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 2, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 25, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 8, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance