Drawing for CHIVALROUS CULTURE

USPTO serial 77837614

CHIVALROUS CULTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBBINS, ODESSA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIVALROUS CULTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard F Mandelbaum

HOWARD F MANDELBAUM LEVINE & MANDELBAUM222 BLOOMINGDALE RD STE 203WHITE PLAINS, NY 10605-1513UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Footwear and wearing apparel, namely, polo shirts, t-shirts, tank tops, hooded jackets, track jackets, sweat shirts, vests, jackets, denim jackets, wind resistant jackets, coats, anoraks, pants, jeans, denims, bottoms, tops, sweaters, and blazersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 21, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 21, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 23, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 21, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 24, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 24, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 10, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 8, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance