Drawing for 3RDIVU

USPTO serial 77837808

3RDIVU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with 3RDIVU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen P. Meleen

STEPHEN P. MELEEN PIRKEY BARBER LLP600 CONGRESS AVE STE 2120AUSTIN, TX 78701-2973UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video screens; video monitors; computer monitors; head-mounted video displays; video displays that may be worn on the body; computer monitors that may be worn on the body; video training devices, namely, electronic glasses that allow user to view normally and to view user's position and movements from various angles using a remote cameraACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 21, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2013RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Jan 22, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 19, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 19, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 12, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jan 11, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 9, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jul 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 28, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 28, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Dec 28, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Dec 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 9, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
Oct 8, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 2, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance