USPTO serial 77838141
PICOMOPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICOMOPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Bill payment services provided through a website; Credit card payment processing services; Electronic commerce payment services, namely, establishing funded accounts used to purchase goods and services on the Internet; Electronic foreign exchange payment processing; Financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options using a mobile device at a point of sale; Loyalty coupon payment processing services; Payment processing services, namely, credit card and debit card transaction processing services; Pre-paid purchase card services, namely, processing electronic payments made through prepaid cards; Pre-paid purchase card services, namely, processing electronic payments through pre-paid cards; Providing electronic processing of ACH and credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; Providing electronic processing of credit card transactions and electronic payments via a global computer network; Providing electronic processing of electronic funds transfer, ACH, credit card, debit card, electronic check and electronic payments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 18, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |