Drawing for DRINK ME

USPTO serial 77838276

DRINK ME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DRINK ME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 25, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 30, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 26, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 17, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 5, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 3, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 28, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 21, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 17, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 14, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 14, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 2, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 2, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 12, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2010ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance