Drawing for A BITE, A BOOK AND A BALL...

USPTO serial 77838408

A BITE, A BOOK AND A BALL...

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with A BITE, A BOOK AND A BALL...?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Smith

ROBERT W. SMITH MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP4 GATEWAY CTR STE 1200NEWARK, NJ 07102-4096UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Non-dairy beverages; non-dairy frozen deserts; non-dairy frozen confections; non-dairy pudding; non-dairy creamers; powders for making food beverages and shakes; dry milk powder; nut butters; nuts and seeds; applesauce; chili; canned or jarred vegetables; jarred fruit; dried corn; edible beans; edible grains; edible seeds; non-dairy legume and seed butters; soup mixes; soups; dry soup provided in cups; broths; hummus; cookies; scones; tarts; dessert bars; fruit based snack bars; granola based snack bars; nut and seed based snack bars; soy based food bars; protein based snack bars; yogurt based snack bars; fruit preserves; fruit-based filling for cakes and pies; cereal containing dried fruit; wheat germ; olive oil; cooking oils; edible oils; edible oil sprays; vegetable oils; canola oils; seed oils; nut oils; fruit oils; nutritional oils; seed oil sprays; flavored infused and spiced vegetable oil sprays; cooking oil sprays; butter substitute; vegetable oil based spreads; frozen appetizers; frozen chicken nuggets; prepared and frozen meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, fruit, vegetables or meat substitutes made from textured vegetable proteins; frozen hors d'oeuvres; meat and poultry substitutes made from textured vegetable proteins, imitation cheese; meat and poultry; milk; snack chips made of vegetables; popcorn; puffed corn snacks; and trail mixes, namely; snack mixes consisting primarily of processed fruits; processed nuts and raisinsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 31, 2009GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 31, 2009GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 31, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance