USPTO serial 77838601
ST. PAUL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KERTGATE, AMY L
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ST. PAUL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Zachary D. Cohen
ZACHARY D. COHEN MCGUIREWOODS LLP901 E CARY STRICHMOND, VA 23219-4063UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Faucets; toilets; bathtubs; toilet seats; bidets; urinals; pedestals, namely, sink pedestals and lavatory pedestals; bath and plumbing fixtures, namely, shower heads, water diverters for showers and baths, bath spouts, standard and pop-up bath drains for sinks, lavatories, showers and bathtubs; none of the aforementioned goods include door lites, side lites, transom lites, all in the nature of glass and plastic panels for doors and door areas, or decorative glass for building use | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Bathroom accessories, namely, soap dispensers, toilet paper holders and dispensers, facial tissue holders, towel bars, towel rings, towel holders and toothbrush holders; none of the aforementioned goods include door lites, side lites, transom lites, all in the nature of glass and plastic panels for doors and door areas, or decorative glass for building use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WoodCrafters Home Products, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by WoodCrafters Home Products, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ST. PAUL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2010 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |