Drawing for GAMETECH EDGE

USPTO serial 77838631

GAMETECH EDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GAMETECH EDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lara Pearson

LARA PEARSON LAW OFFICE OF LARA PEARSON, LTD.774 MAYS BLVD STE 10 PMB 405INCLINE VILLAGE, NV 89451-9613UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in data tracking for manual or electronic daubing bingo game point of sale terminals and for use in tracking bingo hall inventory, excluding computer software for use in data tracking for slot machines, video lottery terminals, video poker machines or other electronic wagering devices used in legalized gaming establishments, and for use in tracking inventory for such devicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2010MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jul 6, 2010ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 2, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 1, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 1, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 1, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 1, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2009TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Nov 13, 2009PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2009MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 7, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance