USPTO serial 77839062
PICCOLO MONDO DONDE LOS NINOS JUEGAN COMO NINOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PICCOLO MONDO DONDE LOS NINOS JUEGAN COMO NINOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Fe, Cuajimalpa, MX
Santa Fe, Cuajimalpa, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter L. Michaelson
PETER L MICHAELSON MICHAELSON & ASSOCIATESPO BOX 8489RED BANK, NJ 07701-8489UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Children's entertainment and amusement centers, namely, interactive play areas; entertainment in the nature of an amusement center; educational services, namely, providing classes, seminars, and workshops in the field of international cultures | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |