USPTO serial 77839181
BAWARCHI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BAWARCHI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary A. Donovan
MARY A. DONOVAN DONOVAN CALVARUSO & YEE LLP110 GREENE ST STE 700NEW YORK, NY 10012-3838UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | East Asian food products, namely, ghees, liquid butters; oils, namely, almond, coconut, corn, mustard and sesame; processed peppers; processed edible seeds; dried lentils; dried beans; dried chick peas; pickles; snack foods, namely, processed beans and processed nuts; prepared entrees and snack foods consisting primarily of dried lentils, dried beans and dried chick peas; chana and daliya, prepared entrees consisting primarily of roasted, fried and cooked chick peas; dabla, katki, and chhunda, prepared entrees consisting primarily of pickles with edible oil, unripened mango, sugar and spices; mogo chips consisting primarily of fried vegetables; chori and moth, prepared entrees consisting primarily of roasted, fried and cooked dried beans; mukhvas, a prepared entree consisting primarily of processed nuts and processed seeds; urad prepared entrees consisting of dried beans and lentils | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Spices; alimentary pastes; tea; condiments; namely, mustard, salt and ketchup; pepper; flour; rice; sauce made from ketchup and chutney; prepared entrees and snack foods consisting primarily of rice and flour; chutneys; garam masala consisting primarily of powdered mixed spices; rooh afza consisting primarily of a rose flavoring syrup; saunt a processed food consisting primarily of powdered dried ginger; sooji a processed food consisting primarily of flour; bhavanagri gathiya, bikaneri sev, bundi, phulwadi, papdi, sev and chevdo namely, snacks consisting primarily of chick pea flour, spices, raisins and oil; and flavoring syrup; namely, citric acid based syrup used for food purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |