Drawing for SPEND SMARTER, MANAGE DEBT BETTER AND SAVE MORE

USPTO serial 77839456

SPEND SMARTER, MANAGE DEBT BETTER AND SAVE MORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DINALLO, KEVIN M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPEND SMARTER, MANAGE DEBT BETTER AND SAVE MORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Baila H. Celedonia

BAILA H. CELEDONIA COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial services, namely, credit card services, prepaid card services offered through cards with stored value, debit card services, electronic credit and debit transaction services, cash disbursement and cash replacement services rendered by credit card, electronic cash transactions, check verification services, check cashing services, point of sale and point of transaction services, transaction authorization and settlement services, electronic payment processing services, bank services, saving account services, money market account services, retirement account services, certificate of deposit account services, bill payment services; facilitating payment services, namely, credit card transaction processing services and debit card transaction processing services, and dissemination of financial information via a global computer network; electronic funds transfer services; providing financial information, namely, credit and debit card data and reports; credit risk management services; security brokerage services; mutual fund investment services; consumer lending services; insurance services, namely, providing information on insurance matters and insurance consultancy and advisory services regarding all of the foregoing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 21, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 20, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 20, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 14, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 21, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance