Drawing for TRAVIS HASSE'S ORIGINAL CHERRY PIE LIQUEUR

USPTO serial 77839878

TRAVIS HASSE'S ORIGINAL CHERRY PIE LIQUEUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRAVIS HASSE'S ORIGINAL CHERRY PIE LIQUEUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Sigalow

DAVID L. SIGALOW ALLEN DYER DOPPELT MILBRATH & GILCHRI255 S ORANGE AVE STE 1401ORLANDO, FL 32801-3460UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033LiqueursACTIVEAug 20, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 8, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 7, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 4, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 29, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 29, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 28, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 28, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 28, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2009GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 18, 2009GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 18, 2009CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 10, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance