Drawing for JENLOGA XR

USPTO serial 77840263

JENLOGA XR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHRODY, ALLISON PAIGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JENLOGA XR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward T. White

Edward T. White LeClair Ryan951 East Byrd StreetRiverfront Plaza, East TowerRichmond, VA 23219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical Products, in the Form of an Extended Release Oral Dosage for the Treatment of Hypertension, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorders and Other Disorders Characterized by Excessive Autonomic HyperactivityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 24, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 15, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 15, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 21, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 17, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2011INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST—
Nov 17, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 17, 2011IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 21, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 20, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 18, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 18, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 24, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 24, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 18, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 30, 2010CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2010APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 20, 2010EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 16, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 15, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 6, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance