USPTO serial 77840668
CISCAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CISCAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gabrielle A. Holley
GABRIELLE A. HOLLEY HOLLEY & MENKER, P.A.PO BOX 96SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075-0096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific instruments, namely, nucleic acid sequencers, imaging devices, namely, electronic imaging apparatus for detecting images and optical signals, and for processing images and optical signals into data, for use in genotyping and sequencing; equipment for sample preparation, amplification, mixing, hybridization, incubation, and washing, namely, sample containers, reagent holders, and pipettes, carrying multiple reagents, chemically modified microscopic beads, sets of chemically modified microscopic beads and sample containers and hollow chambers having chemically modified surfaces; automated laboratory equipment and systems, namely, robotic equipment in the nature of a mechanical arm for positioning and moving containers for samples or adding reagents thereto, and barcode readers; computer systems comprised of computer hardware, computer operating systems, computer software, data files, modems and computer peripheral devices for collecting, storing, analyzing and reporting biological information, and for sample tracking and managing projects, laboratory workflow and data, all the foregoing for use in the fields of scientific, diagnostic and clinical research | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2011 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| May 2, 2011 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |