USPTO serial 77840818
VIEWS FROM THE TOP 12TH 11TH 11TH 10TH 10TH 9TH 9TH 8TH 8TH 8TH 7TH 7TH 7TH 7TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 4TH 4TH 4TH 4TH 4TH 3RD 3RD 3RD 3RD 3RD 3RD 2ND 2ND 2ND 2ND 2ND 2ND 2ND 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST PRESCHOOL KINDERGARTEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIEWS FROM THE TOP 12TH 11TH 11TH 10TH 10TH 9TH 9TH 8TH 8TH 8TH 7TH 7TH 7TH 7TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 4TH 4TH 4TH 4TH 4TH 3RD 3RD 3RD 3RD 3RD 3RD 2ND 2ND 2ND 2ND 2ND 2ND 2ND 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST PRESCHOOL KINDERGARTEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Maumelle, AR
Maumelle, AR
Maumelle, AR
Maumelle, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry C. Query, Jr.
HENRY C. QUERY, JR. HENRY QUERY, P.C.2100 MANCHESTER RD STE 504WHEATON, IL 60187-4586UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for evaluating teacher performance based on student achievement | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gatling, Clara Ingram
- Other trademarks owned by Gatling, Clara Ingram
- Other trademarks owned by Gatling, Jerry B.
- Other trademarks owned by Gatling, Jerry B.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VIEWS FROM THE TOP 12TH 11TH 11TH 10TH 10TH 9TH 9TH 8TH 8TH 8TH 7TH 7TH 7TH 7TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 6TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 5TH 4TH 4TH 4TH 4TH 4TH 3RD 3RD 3RD 3RD 3RD 3RD 2ND 2ND 2ND 2ND 2ND 2ND 2ND 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST 1ST PRESCHOOL KINDERGARTEN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |