Drawing for EPM

USPTO serial 77841494

EPM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EPM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

G. Patrick SAGE

G. PATRICK SAGE HUESCHEN AND SAGE, PLLC107 W MICHIGAN AVE STE 700KALAMAZOO, MI 49007-3976UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016posters and writing instrumentsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2011MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2011ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 22, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 12, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 12, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 8, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 8, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance