Drawing for LADY D

USPTO serial 77842620

LADY D

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LADY D?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christina J. Moser

CHRISTINA J. MOSER BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP1900 E 9TH ST STE 3200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3475UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bath and shower gels and salts not for medical purposes; Bath beads; Bath cream; Bath crystals; Bath fizzies; Bath foams; Bath gels; Bath lotion; Bath milks; Bath oils; Bath pearls; Bath soaps; Blusher; Bubble bath; Concealers for eye area; Eye liner; Eye pencils; Eye shadow; Eyebrow pencils; Face and body lotions; Face powder; Foundation make-up; Hand lotions; Lip balm; Lip gloss; Lip liner; Lipstick; Mascara; Pressed face powderACTIVE—
014JewelryACTIVE—
018Backpacks; Billfolds; Credit card cases; Duffle bags; Handbags; Purses; Tote bags; Umbrellas; WalletsACTIVE—
025Belts; Blouses; Boots; Bras; Coats; Dresses; Flip flops; Footwear; Gloves; Hats; Head scarves; Headbands; Headwear; Hosiery; Jackets; Jeans; Lingerie; Mittens; Overalls; Pajamas; Pants; Sandals; Scarves; Shirts; Shoes; Shorts; Skirts; Slippers; Sneakers; Socks; Sweat shirts; Sweaters; T-shirts; Ties; Underwear; VestsACTIVE—
026Barrettes; Hair clips; Hair scrunchiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 6, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2012EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 27, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 31, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 15, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 4, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 3, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 30, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 30, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 22, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 18, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 18, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 20, 2010ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 6, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 26, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 26, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 27, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 8, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance