USPTO serial 77842903
BIOCENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLISTON, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOCENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Benman
2049 CENTURY PARK E STE 2740LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3239UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated acne treatment preparations; Non-medicated ointments for the prevention and treatment of sunburn; Non-medicated scalp treatment cream; Soaps; non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, cleaners for body, face, hands, ears, nose, hair, vaginal areas and rectum areas; deodorant sticks for personal use; cleaning preparations for use as surface cleanser for home, commercial and industrialize use in the form of sprays, fog, and foam; Cleaning preparations as a virucidal and bactericida agent, namely, antibacterial and antiviral soaps; Sun care lotions; Sun-tanning preparations; Tanning and after-sun milks, gels and oils; Skin toners; Skin care products, namely, non-medicated skin serum; Skin cleansers; Skin cleansing cream; Skin cleansing lotion; Shaving preparations; Non-medicated acne treatment preparations; Non-medicated cosmetic skin care preparations consisting of organic coconut virgin oil and coconut virgin oil; Non-medicated diaper rash ointments and lotions; Hand cleaners; Hand cleaning preparations; Lotions for face and body care; Face and body creams; Face and body lotions; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Cosmetic sun-tanning preparations; Cosmetic suntan preparations; Cosmetics and cosmetic preparations; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic preparations; Cosmetic preparations against sunburn; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for the care of mouth and teeth; Cosmetic preparations for the hair and scalp; Cleaning and washing preparations; Cleaning preparations; Cleaning preparations for cleaning surfaces; Cleaning preparations for household purposes; Cleaning preparations for medical ventilator equipment, tubing, masks; Cleaning preparations that eliminate bacteria that cause products to age or produce foul odors; Body washes; Cleaning agents and preparations; Body lotion; Aftershave preparations; All purpose cleaning preparations; Topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes | ACTIVE | Jan 17, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2011 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 21, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |