Drawing for LMA ORTHOSHOCK

USPTO serial 77843199

LMA ORTHOSHOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LMA ORTHOSHOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Greene

JEFFREY H. GREENE FOLEY & LARDNER LLP90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016-1301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in orthopaedic procedures; apparatus and instruments for the intra-operative provision of mechanical shocks for use in orthopaedic procedures; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 18, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 17, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 2, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance