USPTO serial 77843230
M MILLSON TECH KNOWLEDGE EASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with M MILLSON TECH KNOWLEDGE EASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Uhlir
JAMES R. UHLIR CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PLLC1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-1344UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic signal distribution systems, namely, transmitters, receivers, amplification and distribution equipment for broadcast satellite, cable and broadcast television, closed circuit television, land line telephone, cellular telephone, broadcast radio, Wi-Fi wireless, Wi-Max wireless, Bluetooth wireless, local area network (LAN), internet, security, audio, video, data, serial, infrared, IP and other electronic signals; climate control systems, namely, wired and wireless electronic control of digital thermostats, air conditioning, radiant heating, forced air heating, geo-thermal, heat recovery, ventilation; lighting control systems, namely, wired and wireless electronic control of centralized dimming panels, lighting control processors, stand alone dimmers and switches, wall mounted keypads and hand held controls; window treatment control systems, namely, wired and wireless electronic control of motorized window treatments, namely, roller shades, drapery tracks, roman shades, sheer shades, sun shades, black-out treatments; home theatre systems comprising video displays, multi-channel surround sound receivers, surround sound processors, multi-channel audio power amplifiers, DVD players, BluRay Disc players, hard drive based audio and video servers, cable and satellite set top boxes, audio loudspeakers; automation and control systems, namely, wired and wireless electronic control of automation processors, touch screen controls, climate control systems, lighting control systems, motorized window treatments, home theatre systems, distributed audio, distributed video, internet and content servers; metal and wood equipment racks and racking systems for standard 19" wide electronic components, namely, DVD players, BluRay Disc players, multi-channel audio receivers, audio power amplifiers, hard drive based audio and video servers, and cable and satellite set top boxes; electrical power distribution blocks and units for distributing telephone, cable, and satellite television, local area network (LAN), internet, security, audio, data and other electronic signals from and to external sources and for sending and receiving electronic signals to and from various locations in a dwelling for communication with those external sources; low voltage power distribution and protection component system composed of centralized enclosure, low voltage transformers, standardized mounting platform and circuit breaker protection for distributing telephone, cable, and satellite television, local area network (LAN), internet, security, audio, data and other electronic signals from and to external sources and for sending and receiving electronic signals to and from various locations in a dwelling for communication with those external sources | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation and maintenance of home electronic systems and audio, video, data and other electronic signal distribution systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consulting and design services in the field of home electronic systems and audio, video, data and other electronic signal distribution systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MILLSON TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Millson Multi-Media Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named M MILLSON TECH KNOWLEDGE EASE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 18, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |