Drawing for HOME BASICS

USPTO serial 77843611

HOME BASICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RAPPAPORT, SETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOME BASICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James P. Broder

James P. Broder ROEDER & BRODER LLP4817 Biona Dr.SAN DIEGO, CA 92116United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004CandlesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 10, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 25, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 24, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jan 23, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jan 6, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 6, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 10, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 9, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jun 11, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 11, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Dec 6, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 6, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 24, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 13, 2012TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS
Jun 13, 2012OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jun 13, 2012OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Jul 29, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Feb 18, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jan 19, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 30, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 15, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 1, 2009CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 1, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 1, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Dec 1, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 29, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 15, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 10, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance