Drawing for MQP

USPTO serial 77844071

MQP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MQP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jessica S. Sachs

JESSICA S. SACHS HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.STE 2005445 CORPORATE DRTROY, MI 48098

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
045Evaluating textile manufacturing facilities to determine compliance with regulatory performance standards; on-line safety assessments relating to textile manufacturing facilities; online assessments regarding fair labor practices and safety relating to textile manufacturing; evaluations relating to textile manufacturing facilities, namely, evaluations of performance in relation to fair labor practices and safety standards for the purpose of assessing regulatory compliance; provision of information for the purpose of assessing regulatory compliance relating to the performance of textile manufacturing facilities specifically as it relates to fair labor practices and safety standardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 31, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 8, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 3, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 15, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 15, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 9, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 5, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 3, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 3, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 24, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 23, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 23, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 2, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 2, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 26, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 14, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 7, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 29, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 29, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 11, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 6, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 6, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 22, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 19, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 6, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 6, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 2, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 12, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 15, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 14, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance