USPTO serial 77844685
SID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter S. Sloane
Peter S. Sloane Leason Ellis LLPOne Barker Avenue, Fifth FloorWhite Plains, NY 10601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | JEWELRY, NAMELY, BRACELETS, EAR CLIPS, BROOCHES, CHARMS, PINS, EAR STUDS AND NECKLACES, ALL MADE WITH OR CONTAINING DIAMONDS; DIAMOND PENDANTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLURE GEMS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by A G Weindling, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by A G Weindling, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named SID
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 24, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2011 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 6, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |