USPTO serial 77845626
JUVENTIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUVENTIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rimouski, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
JEFFREY B. SLADKUS, ESQ. JEFFREY B. SLADKUS, LLC1827 POWERS FERRY RD SE BLDG 6ATLANTA, GA 30339-5687UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Active ingredients, namely, seaweed and natural algae for use in the manufacture of natural health products, nutraceuticals and cosmetics | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Biotechnological research services in connection with active ingredients used in natural health products, nutraceuticals, cosmetics in the field of human and animal health | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2009 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 26, 2009 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 26, 2009 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |