USPTO serial 77846283
ILLEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ILLEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Fabrics that may or may not have printed patterns and designs thereon for use in textile applications, namely, the manufacture of apparel, upholstery, signage, flags, banners and wallpaper; Textile fabrics for use in the manufacture of garments, bags, jackets, gloves, and apparel | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2006 |
| 025 | Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2016 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 29, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 27, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |