Drawing for LAPELLE

USPTO serial 77846384

LAPELLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LAPELLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard A. MacCord, Jr.

HOWARD A MACCORD JR MACCORD MASON PLLCPO BOX 2974GREENSBORO, NC 27402-2974UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather for furnitureACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 1, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 27, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 27, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 12, 2011EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 6, 2011GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2011GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2011CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 15, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 15, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 25, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 25, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 21, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance