Drawing for GREEN IS GOOD

USPTO serial 77846473

GREEN IS GOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREEN IS GOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ryan Corrigan

Ryan Corrigan Corrigan Law Group, PC2525 Alluvial Avenue #325Clovis, CA 93611UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, pants, shorts, hats and socksACTIVE—
035Providing a web site where users can post items for sale through on-line classified advertisementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2012UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 19, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 10, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 10, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 17, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 17, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 23, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 21, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 12, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 25, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 25, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 25, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 24, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 24, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 15, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance