Drawing for I-FLY

USPTO serial 77848744

I-FLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAAFAR, SAMIR MICHAEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I-FLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward T. White

EDWARD T. WHITE HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP951 E BYRD ST STE 200RICHMOND, VA 23219-4074UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Transportation of persons, mail, and property by air; providing airline reservation services via computer terminals and the global computer network; computerized reservation and ticketing services for transportationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 15, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 15, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 2, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 19, 2011LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jan 19, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 15, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance