USPTO serial 77849262
VICINITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VICINITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kings Point, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Max Moskowitz
MAX MOSKOWITZ OSTROLENK FABER LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS FL 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8443UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing for men, woman and children, namely, aprons, bib overalls, boots, bottoms, caps, coats, coveralls, detachable hoods for jackets, gloves, hats, hoods, jackets, jeans, lab coats, long underwear, overalls, pants, polo shirts, ponchos, rain jackets, rain pants, rain suits, raincoats, shirts, shorts, socks, suspenders, sweatpants, sweatshirts, tank tops, tops, t-shirts, underwear, and vests, sweaters, all woven and all knit categories; shoes; fragrances; sunglasses; and all hard item categories; ladies constructed suits, constructed woven bottoms (pants, skirts, capris, bermuda shorts); all ladies sportswear, knits and woven tops and bottoms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2010 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |