USPTO serial 77849586
Serial No. 77849586
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 77849586?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sao Paulo, BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kay L. Collins
Kay L. Collins Otis, Coan & Peters, LLC103 W. MountainSuite 200Fort Collins, CO 80524Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Espadrilles, head bands, wrist bands, Bermuda shorts, pants, blazers, caps, boots, scarves, shoes, pants, shirts, T-shirts, cowls and bonnets being headwear, coats, long johns, belts, waistcoats, petticoats, bodices, short pants, corset foundations, gabardines, galoshes, stocking cap, ties, jackets, garter belts, lingerie, gloves, jumpsuits, stockings, tights, jackets, pajamas, gaiters, pullovers, underwear, gym clothes, namely, gym shorts, gym shirts, and gym socks; swimming clothes, dresses that may also be used as towels, sandals, trench coats, thong briefs, bras, sweaters, gowns, clothing, namely, headwear; tunics, uniforms, visors, shawls, babydoll pajamas, nightgowns, coverups, slippers, soccer shoes, work boots, bathing suits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 14, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |