USPTO serial 77850070
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine L. McDaniel
Katherine L. McDaniel Fulwider Patton LLP6060 Center Drive, Tenth FloorLos Angeles, CA 90045UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fruit-based organic food bars; Fruit-based organic food bars, also containing nuts and seeds; Nut and seed-based snack bars; Organic nut and seed-based snack bars; Processed fruit- and nut-based food bars; Soy-based food bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Candy bars; Cereal based energy bars; Grain-based food bars also containing nuts and seeds; Granola-based snack bars; Ready to eat, cereal derived food bars | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |