Drawing for AFEXA

USPTO serial 77850373

AFEXA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AFEXA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher L. Graff

Christopher L. Graff PIRKEY BARBER PLLC600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2120Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005all natural health food supplements, namely, health food supplements from herbal, animal and fish sources which are in the form of ground or dry product, in solution or as an extract of herbal, animal or fish sourcesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 15, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 19, 2013NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 22, 2013NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2013PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2013NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 12, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 13, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 13, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 8, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 8, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 7, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 7, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 4, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 13, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2011ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2010GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2010GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2010CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 3, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 3, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 20, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 28, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2009MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 21, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance