USPTO serial 77850373
AFEXA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AFEXA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Edmonton, Alberta, CA
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Laval, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher L. Graff
Christopher L. Graff PIRKEY BARBER PLLC600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2120Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | all natural health food supplements, namely, health food supplements from herbal, animal and fish sources which are in the form of ground or dry product, in solution or as an extract of herbal, animal or fish sources | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Afexa Life Sciences Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VALEANT CANADA LP
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named AFEXA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 7, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |