Drawing for CLEMENT

USPTO serial 77850947

CLEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John R. Lane

John R. Lane Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.1133 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Tires and inner tubes for bicyclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 19, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 18, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 4, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 20, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 20, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2010GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 20, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 21, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance