USPTO serial 77852604
TWILIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TWILIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill M. Pietrini
Jill M. Pietrini SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Body shimmer powder; cosmetics; fragrances; and non-medicated lip balm; (Based on Intent to Use) Artificial eyelashes; incense; hair care products, namely, hair color remover, hair conditioner, hair dye, hair rinses, hair shampoo, hair waving lotion, and non-medicated hair care preparations; nail care products, namely, artificial fingernails, emery boards, nail polish, nail polish base coat and nail polish top coat; and skin care products, namely, after-shave lotion, anti-wrinkle cream, astringent for cosmetic purposes, bath gel, bath oil, bath powder, beauty masks, body cream, body lotion, bubble bath, depilatory creams, essential oils for personal use, eye cream, eye makeup remover, facial scrubs, hand cream, massage oil, shaving cream, shower gel, skin clarifiers, skin emollients, skin moisturizer, skin soap, sun screen preparations, and suntanning preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 28, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2017 | INOA | AMENDMENT AFTER NOA NOT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 29, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2016 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 1, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2013 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2013 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |