Drawing for TWILIGHT

USPTO serial 77852774

TWILIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWILIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill M. Pietrini

Jill M. Pietrini SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1600Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, leggings and shortsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 1, 2011NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Nov 30, 2011DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 30, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 21, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 21, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 13, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 13, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 13, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 23, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 28, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 25, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 24, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2010DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2009AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 23, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2009NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance